Tax Implications for Athletic Trainers and Interstate Compact
- Shelby Daly

- 17 hours ago
- 2 min read
Athletic Training Tax Implications and the Interstate Work
A lot of ATs likely think about the interstate compact as:
“Now I can legally work in multiple states easier.”
But they may not realize:
“Working in multiple states can also create payroll, tax filing, and recordkeeping obligations.”

This becomes especially problematic because many PRN/event-based AT jobs are:
▪️ Short duration,
▪️Last minute,
▪️Part-time,
▪️Contractor-based,
▪️and spread across many states over a year.
An AT might:
➡️ cover a tournament in Nevada,
➡️ a camp in California,
➡️ a showcase in Texas,
➡️ and a championship in Florida,
without realizing:
⚠️ some of those states may require nonresident tax filings,
⚠️ some may require employer withholding from the first dollar earned,
⚠️ and some have thresholds that are very low.
Many healthcare professionals never receive education on:
⛔ multi-state taxation,
⛔nexus,
⛔nonresident filing,
⛔contractor tax liability,
⛔or payroll withholding laws.
That creates several risks for the AT:
💥unexpected tax bills,
💥penalties/interest,
💥underpayment issues,
💥confusion over 1099 vs W-2 classification,
💥inability to properly deduct travel expenses,
💥or failure to file in required states.
For staffing/event companies
Companies staffing nationwide events may also unknowingly create:
☣️ payroll withholding violations,
☣️ workers compensation issues,
☣️ unemployment insurance issues,
☣️ state labor law exposure,
☣️ and permanent business nexus in states they repeatedly operate in.
This is especially relevant in athletic training because the industry historically evolved more like:
▪️ Per diem staffing,
▪️ Relationship-based contracting,
▪️ and event medicine,
❌ rather than highly structured national healthcare systems.
The interstate compact may unintentionally accelerate the collision between:
▪️ healthcare regulation,
▪️ gig economy practices,
▪️ labor law,
▪️ and tax compliance.
One of the biggest blind spots is that many ATs assume:
“I’m only there for a weekend, so it doesn’t matter.”
But some states technically tax income earned from the first day worked there.
For example:
🌎 New York is known for aggressive nonresident income sourcing.
🌎 California also closely tracks nonresident work income.
Meanwhile states like:
TX, FL, AK, NV, NH, SD, TN, WA, and WY ➡️ have no state income tax.
So the compact could eventually force the profession to have more conversations about:
▪️ employment classification
▪️ standardized payroll practices
▪️ travel documentation
▪️ compliance education
▪️ and operational infrastructure for multi-state healthcare staffing.
That is something many professions discovered only after interstate mobility became common.
DISCLAIMER - Not legal or tax advice. Every state has different laws and requirements. Please seek a tax professional for more support and information.
%20(2)_edited_edited.png)



Comments