top of page

The Hidden Risk of 1099 Athletic Training

  • Writer: Shelby Daly
    Shelby Daly
  • 2 days ago
  • 1 min read

The Hidden Risk of 1099 Athletic Training


The interstate compact may expose one of the biggest gray areas in athletic training:

👉 Independent contractor classification.



A lot of PRN/event AT work historically functions through:

▪️flat rates

▪️gig-style staffing

▪️last-minute assignments

▪️nationwide coverage models

▪️and independent contractor agreements


But healthcare is heavily regulated.

And once interstate practice expands, scrutiny may increase around:

▪️worker classification

▪️payroll withholding

▪️state labor laws

▪️supervision

▪️standing orders

▪️and control of work


Questions that may become more important:

▪️Who provides medical direction?

▪️Who controls clinical decisions?

▪️Who provides supplies?

▪️Who dictates scheduling?

▪️Who determines removal from play?

▪️Is the AT truly independent?


Because legally calling someone a “1099 contractor” does not automatically make it compliant.


The more athletic training expands into:

▪️nationwide staffing

▪️interstate mobility

▪️and healthcare delivery models


…the more the profession may encounter the same labor issues already seen in:

▪️nursing

▪️physical therapy

▪️travel healthcare

▪️and the gig economy.


The interstate compact could become more than a licensure discussion.

It may become an employment model discussion too.


DISCLAIMER - This is not legal or tax advice. Every state has different laws and requirements. Please seek a tax professional for more support and information.

This is a conversation I think the profession needs to start having more openly.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page