The Hidden Risk of 1099 Athletic Training
- Shelby Daly

- 2 days ago
- 1 min read
The Hidden Risk of 1099 Athletic Training
The interstate compact may expose one of the biggest gray areas in athletic training:
👉 Independent contractor classification.

A lot of PRN/event AT work historically functions through:
▪️flat rates
▪️gig-style staffing
▪️last-minute assignments
▪️nationwide coverage models
▪️and independent contractor agreements
But healthcare is heavily regulated.
And once interstate practice expands, scrutiny may increase around:
▪️worker classification
▪️payroll withholding
▪️state labor laws
▪️supervision
▪️standing orders
▪️and control of work
Questions that may become more important:
▪️Who provides medical direction?
▪️Who controls clinical decisions?
▪️Who provides supplies?
▪️Who dictates scheduling?
▪️Who determines removal from play?
▪️Is the AT truly independent?
Because legally calling someone a “1099 contractor” does not automatically make it compliant.
The more athletic training expands into:
▪️nationwide staffing
▪️interstate mobility
▪️and healthcare delivery models
…the more the profession may encounter the same labor issues already seen in:
▪️nursing
▪️physical therapy
▪️travel healthcare
▪️and the gig economy.
The interstate compact could become more than a licensure discussion.
It may become an employment model discussion too.
DISCLAIMER - This is not legal or tax advice. Every state has different laws and requirements. Please seek a tax professional for more support and information.
This is a conversation I think the profession needs to start having more openly.
%20(2)_edited_edited.png)



Comments